<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Google  and Dynamic Logic Co-Present Research on Rich Media Ad Effectiveness at ARF</title> <atom:link href="http://dynamiclogicblog.com/2009/06/24/google-presents-dynamic-logic-research-on-rich-media-ad-effectivness-at-arf/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://dynamiclogicblog.com/2009/06/24/google-presents-dynamic-logic-research-on-rich-media-ad-effectivness-at-arf/</link> <description></description> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 15:13:15 -0400</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: Nick Nyhan</title><link>http://dynamiclogicblog.com/2009/06/24/google-presents-dynamic-logic-research-on-rich-media-ad-effectivness-at-arf/comment-page-1/#comment-16</link> <dc:creator>Nick Nyhan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 15:17:27 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://dynamiclogicblog.com/?p=1849#comment-16</guid> <description>Good to see value of video quantified versus flash and gif/jpeg.  I wonder trade off on the reach - how much do you lose in reach by using video versus gif/jpeg/flash?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good to see value of video quantified versus flash and gif/jpeg.  I wonder trade off on the reach &#8211; how much do you lose in reach by using video versus gif/jpeg/flash?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 1/7 queries in 0.004 seconds using apc

Served from: dynamiclogicblog.com @ 2010-07-29 15:37:40 -->